Congratulations! Correct Answer!
Covenant (kəv-ə-nənt)
C. A formal agreement or promise, usually in a contract.
Listen
to pronunciation
Legal Definition -
n. 1. A formal agreement or promise, usually in
a contract. 2. Treaty 3. A common-law action to recover damages for breach
of contract under seal. 4. A promise made in a deed or implied by law;
especially an obligation in a deed burdening or favoring a landowner.
Black's Law Dictionary® Eighth Edition © 2004
Current
Usage -
"Texas has a strong public policy on noncompete contracts, but after the
Texas Supreme Court's decision in In re AutoNation, Inc. on June 29,
2007, Texas residents cannot be assured that they will be able to keep a
dispute over a noncompete contract in a Texas courtroom. The Texas Supreme
Court, the state's high court, has made it clear that because of the
important public policy concerns regarding noncompetition
covenants, Texas law will
apply to an employee who performs the majority of services in Texas, even
when the parties stipulate the law of a different forum. Thus, even if a
contract says that another state's law will control, the Texas public policy
will overrule the contract language and result in Texas law applying.
What happens, however, with regard to the location of legal disputes? If the
contract says the court of a different state (like Florida) is the exclusive
forum for a legal battle over the noncompete contract, will that contract
provision be honored? Or, will Texas public policy not only overrule the
choice of law clause but also overrule the choice of forum clause as well?
The answer may depend on who gets to the courthouse first, but more likely
than not, the contract's choice of forum will be honored.
Despite the strong state public policy interest in covenants not to compete,
Texas courts have repeatedly enforced forum selection clauses where the
parties have agreed to litigate the question of a noncompetition provision
in another state. Therefore, the initial decision of the Texas Court of
Appeals in AutoNation, Inc. v. Hatfield was somewhat surprising."
New York Law Journal Free: Trends in Employment Law By A. Michael Weber
January 17, 2008